Documentation Process
Documentation Maintenance Process
Overview
This document outlines the process for maintaining Conformo’s documentation, ensuring that all technical and user-facing documentation stays accurate and up-to-date as the platform evolves.
Documentation Structure
Core Documentation Files
- README.md (Root)
- Purpose: Non-technical, one-page overview of the platform
- Audience: Business users, potential contributors, stakeholders
- Content: What Conformo is, key features, getting started
- Update Frequency: When major features are added or the platform vision changes
- docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md
- Purpose: Comprehensive technical architecture documentation
- Audience: Developers, architects, technical stakeholders
- Content: System design, technology stack, architecture decisions
- Update Frequency: When architecture changes or new components are added
- docs/AUTHENTICATION.md
- Purpose: Detailed authentication system documentation
- Audience: Developers working on security features
- Content: Authentication flows, security features, API endpoints
- Update Frequency: When authentication features are modified
- backend/db/README.md
- Purpose: Database setup and API testing guide
- Audience: Developers setting up local environments
- Content: Schema setup, API examples, testing procedures
- Update Frequency: When database schema or API endpoints change
When to Update Documentation
Must Update
Documentation must be updated in the following scenarios:
- Architecture Changes
- Adding new system components (services, databases, APIs)
- Changing deployment architecture
- Modifying technology stack
- Updating integration points
- Update:
docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md
- New Features
- Adding user-facing features
- Introducing new API endpoints
- Implementing new business flows
- Update:
README.md(if user-facing),docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md, relevant technical docs
- Security Changes
- Modifying authentication/authorization
- Adding security features
- Changing security policies
- Update:
docs/AUTHENTICATION.md,docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md
- Database Schema Changes
- Adding/removing tables
- Modifying columns
- Changing indexes
- Update:
backend/db/README.md,docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md
- API Changes
- New endpoints
- Modified request/response formats
- Changed authentication requirements
- Update: Relevant API documentation,
docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md
- Deployment Process Changes
- Modified build process
- New environment variables
- Infrastructure changes
- Update:
docs/TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md, setup guides
Should Update
Documentation should be updated when:
- Minor Improvements
- Performance optimizations
- Refactoring (if architecture patterns change)
- Bug fixes (if they reveal documentation inaccuracies)
- Developer Experience
- New development tools
- Updated setup procedures
- Better practices discovered
- Clarifications
- Common questions from users/developers
- Ambiguous sections
- Missing context
Update Process
For User Stories and Features
When working on a user story or feature:
- Planning Phase
✓ Review acceptance criteria ✓ Identify documentation impact ✓ Plan documentation updates alongside code changes ✓ Add documentation tasks to story checklist - Development Phase
✓ Document architectural decisions as you make them ✓ Note new components, services, or integrations ✓ Keep track of API changes ✓ Take screenshots of UI changes (if applicable) - Before Pull Request
✓ Update all affected documentation files ✓ Review documentation for accuracy ✓ Ensure code examples are correct ✓ Update version history in TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md ✓ Check that README.md remains concise (one-pager) - Pull Request
✓ List documentation changes in PR description ✓ Link related documentation files ✓ Request documentation review alongside code review - After Merge
✓ Verify documentation is accurate post-deployment ✓ Update any deployment-specific guides if needed
For Bugs and Fixes
When fixing bugs:
- Assess Documentation Impact
- Does the bug reveal incorrect documentation?
- Was the documentation unclear, leading to the bug?
- Does the fix change expected behavior?
- Update If Needed
- Correct any inaccuracies
- Add clarifications if the bug revealed confusion
- Update examples if behavior changed
For Refactoring
When refactoring code:
- Internal Refactoring (no architecture change)
- Documentation update: Usually not required
- Exception: If refactoring changes how developers use the code
- Architectural Refactoring
- Documentation update: Required
- Update system diagrams if structure changes
- Update component descriptions
- Update code examples
Documentation Standards
Style Guidelines
- README.md
- Keep it to one page (scrollable)
- Use clear, non-technical language
- Focus on “what” and “why”, not “how”
- Include emojis for visual appeal (sparingly)
- Maintain a friendly, welcoming tone
- Technical Documentation
- Use clear headings and sections
- Include code examples where helpful
- Use tables for structured information
- Add diagrams for complex flows (ASCII art is fine)
- Be precise and accurate
- Assume reader has technical knowledge
- General Principles
- Write in present tense
- Use active voice
- Be concise but complete
- Use bullet points for lists
- Number steps in procedures
- Include dates for time-sensitive information
Content Guidelines
- Technical Architecture Document
- Maintain table of contents
- Include both current and future/planned architecture
- Document the “why” behind architectural decisions
- Keep version history updated
- Review quarterly for accuracy
- API Documentation
- Include request/response examples
- Document error codes and messages
- List required vs. optional parameters
- Show authentication requirements
- Provide cURL examples where helpful
- Setup Guides
- List prerequisites
- Provide step-by-step instructions
- Include troubleshooting section
- Test instructions on clean environment
- Update when dependencies change
Review Process
Regular Reviews
- Quarterly Documentation Review
- Schedule: Every 3 months
- Scope: All documentation files
- Process:
- Check for outdated information
- Verify code examples still work
- Update technology versions
- Improve clarity based on feedback
- Update screenshots if UI changed
- Release Documentation Review
- Schedule: Before each major release
- Scope: User-facing documentation
- Process:
- Ensure all new features documented
- Update version numbers
- Review getting started guides
- Update screenshots and examples
- Architecture Review
- Schedule: Bi-annually
- Scope: Technical Architecture document
- Process:
- Validate current architecture section
- Update target architecture based on roadmap
- Review and update future enhancements
- Assess achieved vs. planned milestones
Documentation Quality Checklist
Before considering documentation complete:
- All affected files identified and updated
- Information is accurate and up-to-date
- Code examples tested and working
- Links are valid and working
- Spelling and grammar checked
- Formatting is consistent
- Tables of contents updated (if applicable)
- Version history updated (for TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md)
- Screenshots updated (if UI changed)
- README.md remains one-pager (concise)
Responsibilities
All Contributors
- Update documentation when making code changes
- Flag outdated documentation in PRs or issues
- Ask questions when documentation is unclear
Maintainers
- Review documentation changes in PRs
- Ensure documentation standards are followed
- Coordinate quarterly documentation reviews
- Keep documentation structure organized
Project Lead
- Approve major documentation restructuring
- Set documentation priorities
- Ensure documentation aligns with project vision
Tools and Resources
Writing Documentation
- Markdown: All documentation uses Markdown format
- Diagrams: ASCII art or Mermaid diagrams (if supported)
- Screenshots: PNG format, reasonable size (< 500KB)
- Code Examples: Tested and verified working examples
Documentation Templates
When creating new documentation files, follow the structure of existing documents:
- Start with a clear title and purpose
- Include table of contents for long documents
- Use consistent heading levels
- End with references or related documents
Continuous Improvement
Feedback Collection
- Monitor issues for documentation requests
- Track questions in discussions
- Note recurring confusion points
- Collect developer onboarding feedback
Improvement Process
- Identify Issues
- Documentation unclear or outdated
- Missing information
- Errors or inaccuracies
- Prioritize
- Critical: Incorrect information
- High: Missing key information
- Medium: Unclear or confusing
- Low: Nice-to-have improvements
- Update
- Make changes in feature branches
- Test instructions/examples
- Submit PR for review
- Verify
- Confirm improvement addresses issue
- Check for related documentation needing updates
Examples
Example 1: Adding a New Feature
Scenario: Adding AI compliance wizard
Documentation Impact:
- README.md: Add feature to “Key Features” section (✓ Already has placeholder)
- TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md:
- Add to “System Components” section
- Update “Current Architecture” diagram
- Move from “Target Architecture” to “Current Architecture”
- Add integration points
- Document AI service configuration
- New file:
docs/AI_WIZARD.md(technical details)
Example 2: Security Enhancement
Scenario: Adding two-factor authentication (2FA)
Documentation Impact:
- README.md: Add to “Key Features” if user-facing
- AUTHENTICATION.md: Add 2FA flows, setup instructions
- TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md:
- Update security architecture section
- Add 2FA service component
- Update authentication flow diagrams
- Add database schema changes (if any)
Example 3: Deployment Change
Scenario: Migrating from Vercel to AWS
Documentation Impact:
- README.md: Update deployment information (if mentioned)
- TECHNICAL_ARCHITECTURE.md:
- Completely rewrite “Deployment Architecture” section
- Update environment variables
- Update build process
- Update scaling strategy
- New file:
docs/AWS_DEPLOYMENT.md(detailed guide)
Questions?
If you’re unsure whether documentation needs updating:
- Ask yourself: “Would a new developer be confused without this information?”
- Check: Is there existing documentation that contradicts the change?
- Consider: Will users or developers interact with this differently?
- When in doubt: Update the documentation. It’s easier to refine than to add later.
For questions about the documentation process, open an issue with the documentation label.
Last Updated: 2025-10-16
Process Version: 1.0